Awoman worked as a secretary in an office in a building occupied partly by her employer and partly by a retail store. the two areas were separated by walls and were in no way connected, except that the air conditioning unit served both areas and there was a common return-air duct. the retail store began remodeling, and its employees did the work, which included affixing a plastic surfacing material to counters. to fasten the plastic to the counters, the employees purchased glue from a manufacturer that was packaged in a sealed container by the manufacturer and retailed by a paint company. in the course of the remodeling job, one of the retail store's employees turned on the air conditioning and caused fumes from the glue to travel from the retail store through the air conditioning unit and into the woman's office. the employees did not know that there was common duct work for the air conditioners. the woman was permanently blinded by the fumes from the glue. the label on the container of glue read, "danger. do not smoke near this product. extremely flammable. contains butanone, tuluol and hexane. use with adequate ventilation. keep out of the reach of children." the three chemicals listed on the label are very toxic and harmful to human eyes. the retail store had received no reports of eye injuries during the ten years that the product had been manufactured and sold. if the woman asserts a claim against the paint company, the most likely result is that she willa. recover because she can recover against the glue manufacturer. b. recover, because the woman was an invitee of a tenant in the building. c. not recover because the paint company was not negligent. d. not recover, because the glue came in a sealed package.