"the plaintiff, while driving a pickup manufactured by the defendant, was struck in the rear by another motor vehicle. upon impact, the plaintiff's head was jarred backward against the rear window of the cab, causing the plaintiff serious injury. the pickup was not equipped with a headrest, and none was required at the time. should the plaintiff prevail on a cause of action based upon strict liability in tort? why? why not? "

Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb.

How would you answer this question. how could you build your practice as an educator for equity, diversity, and inclusion to avoid the oppression of marginalized populations of students?

In recent years, there have been two major criticisms of congress and how it promotes the public good. describe these two in two paragraphs