Which policy was upheld in grutter v. bollinger? title ix civil rights act of 1964 voting rights act of 1965 affirmative action

In the Grutter v. Bolinger case (2003) the Supreme court upheld the affirmative action admission policy of the school of law at Michigan University. The court ruled out that the University of Michigan had compelling interests in the promotion of class diversity in the school. The court of Appeal apprehended that the sentiment of Justice Powell in Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) constituted of a coupling point of reference that built up race diversity as convincing to legislative intrigue adequate under strict examination to legitimize the utilizing of racial inclination in admission. The appellant court additionally dismissed findings of the district court that the law school's "critical mass" was what might as well be called a quo.

Affirmative Action

Explanation:

Affirmative action refers to a set of policies, procedures, and practices that aims at increasing opportunities (mainly in education, employment, and business) of individuals or minorities that have been discriminated against or disadvantaged in the past due to their sex, race, origin or other factors. This policy was upheld in the Grutter v Bollinger Case (2003).

In this case, there was upheld that the University of Michigan Law School's Affirmative Action in student admissions, which took into account the applicant's race in the admissions process because it had a compelling interest in “achieving diversity among its student body,” was constitutional.

i don't see how you want other people to do your work for you and it is like you are just handing your assignment to anybody else and having them deal with it instead of your self i thought this site was for asking questions and somebody could you on it not just handing your work to somebody else to deal with it just saying don't mean to be mean just proving a fact.

explanation:

i think the answer is   b.