subject
History, 24.07.2019 18:30 zaratayyibah

In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states. b. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. c. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south. d. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 00:30, brittanysanders
What does munich’s refer to in the 13 days
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, lnr919
Which significant event in texas history occurred in 1876?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, britt0412
How important was the erie canal in in connect, unify and expand the nation
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 15:30, hannahmckain
Why would southern delegates to the constitutional convention have opposed the three-fifths compromise? a) they feared that the president would eventually become "king" in the united states. b) they believed it would be insufficient in protecting the united states from invasion. c) they opposed the creation of a congress that would give states an equal number of senators. d) they wanted their full population of slaves to be counted for purposed of congressional representation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 27.05.2021 02:50
Konu
Mathematics, 27.05.2021 02:50