History, 25.07.2019 13:00 heyrosaphoto2610

Which wartime leader would have opposed the holding of free elections in poland after world war ii?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Stalin: Being Stalin saw Poland as a satellite nation to the USSR he would not want to lose influence over the country to Western powers.

Poland being the neighbor of the USSR, it provided protection and a buffer from Western powers. Poland was a part of the Warsaw Pact but had Western thinkers within the borders. An election after WWII may caused Poland to elect a democratic republic with capitalism as their economic system.

Answer from: northsidehotboy

Stalin would have been against free elections in Poland. Free Elections would have pushed the ideology of democracy which was completely opposite from what Stalin was in favor of. Add the fact that Poland was so close to the USSR that it represented an even greater threat to Russian Communism and his ability to remain in control as a dictator.

Answer from: Quest

d) the constitution rights of native americans and their right to self-government on reservations

Answer from: Quest

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.