Were the incas or the aztecs egalitarian?

First lets get the definition of egalitarian straight. It is, summed up from the dictionary, a system of government where all were equal. This is up to debate because both tribes, kings, and peasants. But in My opinion after scouring the web the Incas were more egalitarian because they gave more representation to the people by organizing them into districts much like the present day US. The Aztecs on the other hand just had a king and the king did everything much like an absolute monarchy

One was to hold a leash on a despot and future despots to come, another was set to ensure no despots ever came to power.