Why would ironclads prove more important to the union than to the confederacy? a. the war at sea was not important to the confederacy, but it was to the union. b. the confederacy did not have the resources to make ironclads, but the union did. c. the confederate navy did not need ironclads, the union navy did. d. the confederate navy already controlled important waterways.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

the main objectives of the progressive movement were eliminating problems caused by industrialization, urbanization, immigration, and political corruption.

using the media to encourage public support for an idea.

encouraging congress to take action

establishing a public policy goal for the nation