Why did the united states invaed iraq in 2003? check all the boxes that apply.

The correct items from the choices listed in the comment box:

A) Bush believed Hussein and Iraq had WMDs.

B) Bush argued that Iraq had previously supported terrorist organizations.

C) The United States claimed that Iraq was not fully cooperating with UN weapons inspectors.

In addition to those overtly stated reasons for initiating war against Iraq in 2003, there was also the underlying "Bush Doctrine" of the value of a "preemptive strike" against a dangerous regime.  The Bush Doctrine (after Pres. George W. Bush) proposed that the best defense against terrorism  was to use American power to spread democratic values in countries that were potential breeding grounds for terrorist activity.

This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of  President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush.  In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might.  The core ideas of the "Bush Doctrine" were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.  

Bush believed Hussein and Iraq had WMDs.

Bush argued that Iraq had previously supported terrorist organizations.

The United States claimed that Iraq was not fully cooperating with UN weapons inspectors.

It's A, B, and C

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

before there were tanks, machine guns, windmills, and solar panels, the first civilizations emerged that create the history of humanity which provided the larger context for western civilization. uses of weaponry and technology were used very differently in the ancient civilizations than they are today. relating back to the times of the ancient mesopotamian civilization, technology kept advancing throughout the ancient egyptian civilization into the ancient greek civilization, and then finally the ancient roman civilization. as techniques and strategies were past down from civilization to civilization, each shared its own similarities, as well as varied differences. one trait they had in common was to commit violence and economically overpower one another. technology has ultimately advanced due to the knowledge transferred from generation to generation. uses of sophisticated weaponry and devices have created more opportunity for warfare and improvement in the work place. ancient civilizations became more powerful due to the advancements of technology. technology did not only create the use of violence, but it also the economies grow and become stronger, because production of trading goods rose like never before. the rivers, such as the nile, tigris, and euphrates all flourished, as well as destructed civilizations. each civilization had different uses for these rivers, however, some benefited more than others. when analyzing ancient civilizations, there   are things you must understand

explanation: