Which identifies the significance of the nuremberg trials? a. provided a precedent for international cooperation and justice for all war crimes b. ensured the execution of every high-ranking nazi official c. established the pattern for future friendly cooperation between the united states and the soviet union d. created four allied occupation zones in postwar germany

The correct answer is A. The Nuremberg Trials provided a precedent for international cooperation and justice for all war crimes.

Explanation:

The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals, organized by the Allies after World War II, concerning proceedings against 24 prominent members of Nazi Germany's political, military and economic leadership. The trials, by an International Military Tribunal, took place in the city of Nuremberg, Germany, from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. This court served as the basis for the establishment of the International Criminal Court, established in The Hague, Netherlands. In addition, these trials set precedents for international war crimes.

its c not d   tell me if that´s correct

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005