Which did not prompt european imperialism in the late nineteenth century? -promises of prosperity -need for raw materials -discovery of gold in africa -zeal for missionary work

The correct sentense is "-Discovery of gold in Africa "

The term New Imperialism (also Neoimperialism) refers to the policy and ideology of colonial expansion and imperialism adopted by the European powers and later by the United States and Japan from the late nineteenth century to the early twentieth century, approximately since the Franco-War. Prussian (1871) until the beginning of the First World War (1914). The qualifier "new" is to contrast it with the first wave of European colonization from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries and with imperialism in general. It is characterized by an unprecedented persecution of what has been called "the empire for the empire itself", an aggressive competition for the acquisition of overseas territories accompanied by the emergence in colonizing countries of doctrines of racial superiority that denied the ability of the peoples subjugated to govern themselves.

This was what was reflected during the 19th century in the African continent.

lincoln presided over the union victory in the american civil war, which dominated his presidency. a former whig, lincoln ran on a political platform opposed to the expansion of slavery in the territories. his election served as the immediate impetus for the outbreak of the american civil war.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!