Which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.

The following are the correct answers:

1) Power would be too centralized- Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who thought that a strong central (aka federal) government would result in tyranny. This sense of paranoia was a result of the treatment American colonists received while under the control of a strong British government.

2) States would become less powerful- Anti-federalists felt that state governments should have the most power. This group felt that state governments understood their citizens better and were more aware of their needs in comparison to a big central government.

3)A Bill of Rights was not included.- Without a Bill of Rights, Anti-federalists were worried that a strong central government would start taking away the rights of American citizens.

The Anti-Federalists were against the implementation of the Constitution as the government power would become too centralized. The states would have less power in their hand and the bill of rights was not part of the constitution.

The constitution of the US was initiated in the year 1787, which Anti-Federalists opposed due to the following reasons:

Learn more about the US constitution here:

link

tell him great job!

explanation:

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.