1. john 5: 24 - forgiveness of sins and iniquities 2 . hebrews 10: 16-17 - no condemnation for those in christ 3 . romans 8: 1 - everlasting life for those who hear and believe 4 . john 10: 28-29 - wisdom given liberally if we ask 5 . james 1: 5 - answered prayer if in accord with his will 6 . john 14: 2-3 - in temptation; no unbearable temptation 7 . philippians 4: 7 - peace will keep our heart through christ jesus 8 . 1 corinthians 10: 13 - fruitfulness if we abide in christ 9 . 1 john 5: 14-16 - no one can "snatch" or "pluck" from christ's hand 10 . john 15: 5 - has prepared a place so we can be with him match the left side with the right side ! match the verses with the promise.

1.- John 5:24 -               everlasting life for those who hear and believe.

2.- Hebrews 10:16-17 - forgiveness of sins and iniquities.

3.- Romans 8:1 -            no condemnation for those in Christ.

4.- John 10:28-29 -        no one can "snatch" or "pluck" from Christ's hand.

5.- James 1:5 -               wisdom given liberally if we ask.

6.- John 14:2-3 –            has prepared a place so we can be with him.

7.- Philippians 4:7 -         peace will keep our heart through Christ Jesus.

8.- 1 Corinthians 10:13 - help in temptation; no unbearable temptation.

9.- 1 John 5:14-16 -        answered prayer if in accord with his will.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is