Why did the dred scott decision case increase the sectional tensions between the north and the south?

The North contemplated it has evidence that the federal government were corrupted or utilizing over the "slave potential." a minimum of no longer actively anti-slavery or Presidents tended to be professional-slavery, the Senate replaced into held hostage by utilising professional-slavery Senators, and the living house replaced into impotent, as slave states have been overrepresented in Congress subsequently of counting slaves as 3/5 of a guy or woman for determining how many Representatives that state have been given in the living house. At an analogous time as the Republican Party surged in potential, The Democratic Party began to fracture between Northern and Southern Democrats, culminating in Abraham Lincoln's victory in the 1860 election that sparked the Civil conflict.

a

explanation: