Pl answer who chose electors prior to 1820, and why did the process change? state lawmakers chose electors, but the process changed because people wanted more of a say in the selection. federal lawmakers chose electors, but the process changed because state lawmakers wanted more control over the selection. white males who owned land chose electors, but the process changed because those who did not own land wanted a say in the selection. all white male citizens chose electors, but the process changed because state lawmakers wanted more control over the selection.

overtime, the civil rights movement changed in a way that not only it benefited african-americans, but benefited other ethnicity's such as latinos, asians, or women too! that's why the results of the movement be called mixed.

the civil rights movement brought about tremendous changes. no longer were blacks denied the right to vote, to eat, shop, and swim where they , and more importantly, to attend integrated schools. despite its many accomplishments, however, the civil rights movement had its shortcomings. for example, many people, both young and old, lost their lives, homes, jobs, and families. still other individuals were so damaged by psychological trauma that they ceased being productive members of the community. the movement left intact the economic inequities that had contributed to the maintenance of segregation. and finally, racism remained alive and well long after the movement's end. like most movements of its kind, the civil rights movement left behind a mixed legacy of triumph and tragedy.

the answer to your question is:

strong-mayor system