subject
History, 24.07.2019 07:00 alicat20

In 1966, the supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that: question 2 options: suspects could not refuse to cooperate with police. local elections could be monitored by federal officials.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, lashaydews12
Which sentence best describes the effect of the bill of rights? a. it gave parliament the right to elect a successor when a monarch died. b.it ensured that no monarch could rule without parliament. c.it guaranteed all people the rights of liberty and property. d.it defined the rights of the officials of the church of england.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, awdadaddda
10. how were the mycenaeans and the minoans similar? they did not enslave anyone or tolerate slavery in any form. they had an organized and strong central government. they designed and built heavily fortified settlements. they reigned and traded in and around the aegean sea.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, liljobe8973
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:30, hannaboo53
What restrictive measure required voters to pay to vote
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1966, the supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that: question 2 options: suspects could no...

Questions in other subjects: