subject
History, 21.07.2019 10:00 lpierce35

Use the statement below to answer the following question: the skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. how would a historian most likely describe this statement? a.)it is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof. b.)it shows bias because determining the size of an object is an opinion. c.)it is a fact because the writer is a modern-day human. d.)it shows neither fact nor opinion.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:00, djemdn
What is the title of the head of thr department of defense?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, FlyToTheGalaxy
Iwill arward ! , i if po≅ pr, uo≅ ur, prove: ∠o ≅ ∠r. fill in the blanks: draw segment ≅ uo ≅ po≅ △oup ≅ △
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:00, reycaden
Why is it important that dr. luther king jr. use non-violent protest to create social change?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:30, jediDR
Between 1820 and 1860, the united states received a huge number of immigrants from european nations. on the map, identify the state where the most immigrants moved in search of jobs.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Use the statement below to answer the following question: the skulls of early human-like creatures...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 19.10.2019 13:30
Konu
Mathematics, 19.10.2019 13:30