History, 12.07.2019 17:20 danteyoungblood7

Cell phones have given millions of people the ability to become photographers and videographers. some of us are now able to document almost every aspect of our lives. do you ever post images or videos online or share them with other people? do you think the images we find online will serve as useful primary sources for historians in the future? why or why not? write down your views in two or three sentences.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: gshreya2005

This question should be based on what you think, not what others think.
My views on this is:
I post pictures once in a while online whether it be on Instagram or another form of Social Media. It is a good way for people to find out what is going on in others lives. Pictures and videos later on in the future would give historians a general idea of what it was like in this time period. With the use of Internet and technology, it wouldn't be that difficult to find previously documented events.

Again, this is my view on it and I suggest you write it out yourself. Hoped I helped a little bit.

Answer from: 27lcasselberry

Explanation:

I do occasionally post pictures and videos that I have taken on social media websites to share with my friends. I think that the images we find online could tell future historians a lot about the events of our generation if an unbiased photographer has taken them. However, if the photographer was trying to portray his point of view, the images may not provide an accurate or factual image of the past. Even so, they could tell historians something about the viewpoint, beliefs, and values of the photographer and the people of our era.

THAT'S THE RIGHT ANSWER

Answer from: Quest

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

Answer from: Quest

explanation: