Do some brief research on the outcome of the presidential election in 2000. consider the role of the supreme court in that matter of bush v. gore and the balance of powers discussed in this section. do you think that the supreme court had the legal right to involve itself in the outcome of the election? make an argument that defends your claim. use your understanding of the branches of government to support your reasoning.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

in contrast, the biological controls are self-sustaining, inexpensive and very effective once established. biological control could be used on thousands of golf course acres, improving their biodiversity and quality as wildlife habitat. in the process, the golf industry will be shown to be leaders in an environmental stewardship program of benefit not only to the lands they manage but also to the watersheds in which they exist.