subject
History, 22.08.2019 04:00 Kingdcn6261

What was the federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution?
a separate bill of rights was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms.
a separate bill of rights be might used later to free enslaved people.
a separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
a separate bill of rights might be used later to limit rights that were not originally listed.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:00, taekookie01
The french people were divided intoestates. church officials, such as priests, were members of theestate. peasants belonged to theestate.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, alexvane78
Why did the fighting go on after the armistice was signed
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:30, mydoggy152
During the cold war, the united states was involved in certain regional conflicts due to fears later called the domino theory, which stated which concept?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:00, camila68
Achilles how to anger chryses even more how they can defeat their enemy why chryses left without his daughter or why apollk is so angry
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What was the federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution?

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 28.08.2020 01:01
Konu
Mathematics, 28.08.2020 01:01
Konu
History, 28.08.2020 01:01
Konu
Mathematics, 28.08.2020 01:01
Konu
Mathematics, 28.08.2020 01:01