How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about state government? Webster believed that the state governments were given many powers by the Constitution, while
Calhoun believed states had limited powers based on the Constitution.
Webster believed that the state governments voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal
government, while Calhoun believed that the agreement was forced upon the states.
О.
Webster believed that the state governments had no say over federal laws, but Calhoun believed that
states had the right to ignore federal laws.
Webster believed that the state governments lacked any rights, while Calhoun believed that state
governments had rights that the federal government granted to them.

The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools