What conclusion did the Court reach to solve the problem identified in the passage? It could choose to follow either the law or the Constitution.
It had to come up with a new law of its own.
It must strike down any law that contradicts the Constitution.
o It should follow the law because it was more recent.

The most likely conclusion that the Court would reach to solve the relevant problem is to strike down any law that contradicts the Constitution.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land in which the Court is based which means that all laws must be in line with it.

The Court will therefore strike down any law that goes against the Constitution, in order to maintain the supremacy of the Constitution.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on the Supremacy of the Constitution at

evelyn "champagne" king

love come down

explanation:

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3