Was the 1947 division of India a good decision BASED on what people knew at that time? why or why not? Asap, any irrelevant answers will be REPORTED.

it was a good decision

Explanation:

because the people of Pakistan wanted war and stuff

According to me it was not a good decision because during the partition thousands of innocent lives were taken. This partition created a chaos in the country which was a bad side of this decision. But at the same time it was a good decision because most of the people who lived in Pakistan at that time wanted a war and havoc. As we know that every thing has its own advantages and disadvantages!

i think they came to washington to protest

answer: i looked it up

explanation: in 1955 in montgomery, alabama, a girl refused to give up her seat on a public bus. the girl was black, and the passenger looking to take her seat was white. this is a familiar tale, but it's not about rosa parks. the girl in the story is a 15-year-old high school student named claudette colvin, and this act of defiance occurred nine months before rosa parks did the same thing. colvin was arrested, and her case is what led to the u.s. supreme court's order for the desegregation of alabama's bus system. so, why don't we know colvin's name? "later i had a child born out of wedlock; i became pregnant when i was 16," colvin says. "and i didn't fit the image either, of, you know, someone they would want to show off.