Do you think the authors of the Anti-Federalist Papers would argue that ordinary men should be heavily involved in government, or that an elite class of educated men should be heavily involved in the government? Cite evidence from at least one of the Anti-Federalist Papers to support your claim.

The authors of the Anti-Federalist paper would advocate for ordinary man's involvement in government.

Explanation:

Many Anti-Federalists preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny.

They included primarily farmers and tradesmen and were less likely to be a part of the wealthy elite than were members of their opposition, who called themselves Federalists.

The Anti-Federalists believed that each state should have a sovereign, independent government.

if you like my answer, please mark me brainliest <3

monarchy doesn’t have to have the hereditary element. there have been elective monarchies in the past where you choose your king-for-life and when he dies elect someone else for the job.

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!