History, 02.11.2021 04:00 rosieposie27

In determining if a law or action is legal or not, the Supreme Court always refers back to the Constitution. Is it wise to refer back to a single document when interpreting modern law? What would happen if the courts referred to no document of laws or principles

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 17:30, xcji2277

One argument of those who supported the gold standard system in the united states was that the gold standard

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:00, user1234536

Humans during the paleolithic era used fire for each of the following purposes except a. for cooking meat b. for use as a weapon c. for heat and warmth d. for treating animal hides select the best answer from the choices provided

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 05:00, eduardo60

Plz which of the following statements about spanish plantations is not accurate? a. spanish plantations grew sugarcane for export to spain b. the spanish had little concerned for the lives of the indians who worked on the plantations. c. spanish plantations grew wide variety of crops and center produce to many different european countries. d. to replace the native americans our dying off the spanish imported african slaves.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 09:00, gbrightwell

Analyze how napoleon used a coup d'etat to establish absolute rule.

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

In determining if a law or action is legal or not, the Supreme Court always refers back to the Const...