subject
History, 30.10.2021 03:20 1937

Suppose you encountered someone who maintained: "much of what Socrates went through at the end of his life could have been easily avoided if he had only taken his own advice and lived a private life as he himself said in the Apology. He would not have
offended the rich and powerful, he would not have been put on trial, and he would not have had to reason with Crito about the
appropriateness of escaping."
How would you reply? Would "being private" in this sense mean giving up anything that he holds to be important? If so, clarify
what would have to be forsaken, and why you think he would not be willing to do so. It would be helpful to consider Socrates'
self-description as a "gadfly" for Athenian society. How did he put this into practice and does this explain why he was brought
to trial and executed?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:00, JesuGranger
Explain the difference between the prosecutor in a criminal case and the prosecutor in a civil case.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:30, jameahkitty123
Why did nationalists feel that a unified italy made sense
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:30, eliezer25
Why was buddhismespecially attractive to the lower jati and untouchables?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 15:00, jayy2x41
The yalta conference was held in the country of
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose you encountered someone who maintained: "much of what Socrates went through at the end of hi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 05:30