A historian publishes a paper on the ancient Greek leader Alexander the Great. However, most scholars reject his paper on the basis that the research is not reliable. Which factor could have led to this conclusion? A. The historian chose a subject that was unpopular among other scholars. B. The paper credited too many sources by renowned historians. C. The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations. D. The historian taught history at a prestigious but small university. E. The historian regularly maintained personal historical blogs.

a historian researching the immigration policies of the early 1900s would expect a source written today,rather than in 1910 to :

( a ) be more interested in objective data and statistics.

answer: this is because archeologists keep finding artefacts and ancient ruins dated more than 10000 to 15000 years, date around scientists said humans discovered language; which is at least mysterious as scientists always have said that is necessary to have a language to have architecture and some basic maths.

explanation: brainlest

they spoke the dravidian language. hope this , correct me if im wrong