Why do you think having three separate branches of government was a persuasive argument for ratifying the Constitution?

Ifound this on google “the act represented the first effort since the passage of the civil rights act of 1964 to modify some of the basic procedural and substantive rights provided by federal law in employment discrimination cases. president bush had used his veto against the more comprehensive civil rights act of 1990.” for more information go to the website below › wiki › can you mark me brainliest?

Ithink it's f if it's not then it is c a

Cis the answer your looking for