HI i will mark brainlist how could the duel between Hamilton and Burr be seen as not just a fight between two men determined to save their political careers but a fight between two parties--the Federalists and the Republicans? Why did Hamilton feel obligated to accept Burr's challenge? Why did Burr issue the challenge? Do you think the duel could have been avoided and, if so, how do you think American history would have been changed if Hamilton had lived? Lastly, make a connection to today's political climate. How can we change the way we view politics so we begin to work together?

Use this excerpt from the corpus luris civilis (justinian's law code) to answer the following question: with the aid of god governing our empire, which was delivered to us by his celestial majesty, we carry on war successfully. we ador peace and maintain the constitution of the state, and have such confidence in the protection of almighty god that we do not depend upon our arms, or upon our soldiers, or upon those who conduct our wars, or upon our own genlus, but we solely place our reliance upon the providence of the holy trinity, from which are derived the elements of the entire world and their disposition throughout the globe. --public domain from this excerpt of the prologue of the corpus luris civilis, what departure from older roman traditions is clear? the laws show that the empire has developed a bureaucracy that makes normal soldering unnecessary. the law now honors christianity as a central part of the empire's existence. the law explains that the roman empire is using war to spread roman ideas. the law has replaced old social class divisions with an egalitarian church,