How can you use the legends to argue that alexander was not great?

Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria. Using this document, argue that Alexander was not “great”. Alexander wasn't “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.

the answer for 3 is b and the answer for 4 is d