A grandmother knew someone that was a soldier in World War One and the soldier told her all of his stories about life on the front lines. The grandmother retold those stories to her grandchildren. Is the grandmother a primary or secondary source?

secondary

Explanation:

Think of the grandmother as being something like a newspaper. She is told some stories about WWI and she records them. Maybe she edits the order in which they were told her, but if she has a good memory, she doesn't change the facts of the story.

That places her in the same category as a newspaper. That's a secondary source.  It interviews people to get their stories, but the reporter doesn't repeat the events. He /  she merely writes what she has been told up and an editor sees that it is printed. Same with grandmother. She just reports what was told her. She did not re enact the experience.

sorry i tried to but i didn’t get it

from the religious point of view, the conflicts began because of the enmity between catholic and protestants. in 1649, at the insistence of baltimore, the colonial assembly approved the act of religious tolerance, the first law in the colonies granting freedom of worship, though only for christians. in 1654, however, with the protestants of maryland in the majority, the act was revoked. the almost civil war broke out and order was not restored until 1658, when lord baltimore was returned to power.

on the issue of class conflict, the chesapeake region offered few economic opportunities to contract employees who had served their term of obligation. even with the small amount of capital needed to grow tobacco, former hired servants at best became subsistence farmers, a mature class for those called to rebellion, such as those proposed by nathaniel bacon. as the number of new hired workers declined because of limited chances of progress and reports of severe treatment, they were replaced by african slaves.

from the racial point of view, after 1660, the chesapeake colonies imposed laws that defined slavery as a lifelong and hereditary condition based on race. this made slaves profitable because planters could rely not only on their work but also on their children. the slave population, which numbered four thousand in virginia and maryland in 1675, grew significantly by the end of the century.