HELP WILL GIVE POINTS!! Question refers to the excerpt below.
"If protected conduct is made criminal and the law which does so remains unexamined for its substantive validity, its stigma might remain even if it were not
enforceable as drawn for equal protection reasons. When homosexual conduct is made criminal by the law of the State, that declaration in and of itself is an invitation
to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in the public and in the private spheres. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify
its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual. They (the writers of the Constitution and its amendments) knew times can blind us to certain truths
and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress. As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can
invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom."-Justice Anthony Kennedy, from the Opinion of the Court in Lawrence v. Texas, 2003

Which of the following trends in U. S. society does this ruling reflect?

Public opposition toward government involvement in private life

Continued calls to enforce standards of traditional morality

Disconnect between court rulings and public attitudes

Greater awareness and acceptance of diverse lifestyles

- "the most famous structure by far at saqqara is djoser's step pyramid. dating from the 3rd dynasty (2667—2448 bc), it was the first all-stone complex ever built on earth."

< 3

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

1) she is extremely upset

nationalization is the set of dispositions and operations by means of which the state assumes, in varied form, the administration of private companies, of groups of companies or of the totality of certain economic sectors previously managed by individuals, such as the land portions. nationalization is the opposite of privatization. it is also called nationalization of the means of production, although a nationalized company can be previously both national and foreign ownership. nationalization or nationalization is a very characteristic action of ideologies such as socialism and nationalism.