In which way does a dictatorship differ from a democracy? a
In a dictatorship, the power is held by one person and political party.
b
Dictatorships have short-term limits on their rule.
c
A democracy exists if the people can vote, regardless if the ballot contains only one candidate or party.
d
Leaders in a dictatorship are always democratically elected.

The way a dictatorship differs from democracy is that a country ran by dictatorship may be elected democratically however. People who live in country ran by dictatorship may have very little in how their country is ran or if their opinion is heard by the government. But in a democracy the people have a say in how their country is ran to an extent and their opinions are heard more then in a dictatorship that is how they differ from each other.

Explanation:

american troops were forced to withdraw following deadly bombings.

explanation:

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.