subject
History, 18.08.2021 03:00 jamie316

2. Which statement is an argument FOR using the atomic bomb? O A. Its development had been relatively quick and easy.
B. It was like other weapons of war, just more powerful.
C. The USSR had already developed an atomic bomb.
D. It would be the first bombing attack on the mainland of Japan.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 22:40, lifewkeya
What does the case of mary dyer in 1660 illustrate? a. puritans practiced a fierce rhetoric but were lenient in practice. b. quakers had a tenuous grasp on the social realities of the english colonies. c. quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense. d. quakers practiced their religion without a church and without clergy.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, sierraaasifuent
Wiiy is limportant to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation? o a. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. b. historical interpretations are not valid if they are written in a similar context as the event. o c. every historical interpretation must consider the long-term consequences of an event. o d. the setting of an event can provide insight into why it happened.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:20, Aced
Select all that apply. identify two reasons for the fall of the ming dynasty. invasion by the japanese and koreans death of the emperor invasions poor leadership
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, avi46
Did the media show any bias while covering the concord city election? explain your response.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
2. Which statement is an argument FOR using the atomic bomb? O A. Its development had been relative...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 22:50
Konu
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 22:50