2. Which statement is an argument FOR using the atomic bomb?
O A. Its development had been relatively quick and easy.
B. It was like other weapons of war, just more powerful.
C. The USSR had already developed an atomic bomb.
D. It would be the first bombing attack on the mainland of Japan.
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 22:40, lifewkeya
What does the case of mary dyer in 1660 illustrate? a. puritans practiced a fierce rhetoric but were lenient in practice. b. quakers had a tenuous grasp on the social realities of the english colonies. c. quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense. d. quakers practiced their religion without a church and without clergy.
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, sierraaasifuent
Wiiy is limportant to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation? o a. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. b. historical interpretations are not valid if they are written in a similar context as the event. o c. every historical interpretation must consider the long-term consequences of an event. o d. the setting of an event can provide insight into why it happened.
Answers: 3
2. Which statement is an argument FOR using the atomic bomb?
O A. Its development had been relative...
History, 03.11.2020 22:50
English, 03.11.2020 22:50
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 22:50
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 22:50