If you were a supreme court justice which philosophy would you utilize activism or restraint

I would use judicial activism.

Explanation:

Judicial activism refers to a judge or court that is more willing to invalidate legal or governmental action. This concept is therefore broader than the strict right of review, whereby a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure is in accordance with a law of a higher order such as a constitution or a treaty. Therefore, as a judge, I would evaluate the constitutionality of the different laws and government actions, interpreting their legality in a broad way, and not only limiting myself to the text of the law.

to it’s stable government, it has been able to accept refugees from somalia and south sudan. (apex)

definitely a for sure. ill see and update if i get the answer