A historian is making a historical argument about the French Revolution. He notes that, following the Revolution, a rash of violence swept over France. He refers to the execution of French royalty and the European wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument. In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones. Which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?

A. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.

B. He notes that, following the Revolution, a rash of violence swept over France.

C. In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals.

D. He refers to the execution of French royalty and the European wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument.

do you want to each other with answers? ?

wealthy plebeians became part of the roman nobility. however, despite changes in the laws, the patricians always held a majority of the wealth and power in ancient rome. a third social class in roman society was the slaves. around one third of the people living in rome were slaves.

hope this

your stuuupid lolz

explanation:

after the civil war, and with the termination of slavery, the south was faced with a big problem; what was supposed to happen and how they were supposed to deal with the freedom and the rights that black people and freed slaves had gained as a result of the north defeating the south and forcing the end of slavery. first, most, if not all, of the workforce of the south came from slaves and they did not have an option to replace the loss of said workforce. second, particularly in the south, people were convinced that black people were lesser, less intelligent, less capable and less smart than whites. this posed a huge problem for them. also, southerners were faced with another issue; freed slaves now had a say in how their lives would be lived and the right to politically choose the way they would be governed. people in the south did not want to accept this, none of this and this opposition and the conflicts that arose from it, not to mention the afereffects of the war, forced the congress of the time to enact and enforce the reconstruction plans that had been proposed by president andrew johnson.