How did the lack of executive and judicial branches weaken the national government under the articles of confederation?

The lack of an executive branch meant the national government wasn´t able to implement or enforce legislative decisions. The lack of a judicial branch meant there wasn´t a process placed to resolve disputes between states.

Explanation:

Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had substantial power, while the central government was kept weak by only allowing its authority over specific issues. The national government relied on the states to enforce national laws, as well as to regulate trade resolve disputes, and printing money.

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.

after the civil war, and with the termination of slavery, the south was faced with a big problem; what was supposed to happen and how they were supposed to deal with the freedom and the rights that black people and freed slaves had gained as a result of the north defeating the south and forcing the end of slavery. first, most, if not all, of the workforce of the south came from slaves and they did not have an option to replace the loss of said workforce. second, particularly in the south, people were convinced that black people were lesser, less intelligent, less capable and less smart than whites. this posed a huge problem for them. also, southerners were faced with another issue; freed slaves now had a say in how their lives would be lived and the right to politically choose the way they would be governed. people in the south did not want to accept this, none of this and this opposition and the conflicts that arose from it, not to mention the afereffects of the war, forced the congress of the time to enact and enforce the reconstruction plans that had been proposed by president andrew johnson.