What was NOT a result of the construction of the canal from Lake Erie to the Hudson River?

Employment opportunities grew, especially for immigrants.

Construction boomed along the canal route.

Federal financing became more readily available.

The cost of transporting goods dropped significantly.

Federal financing became more readily available.

Explanation:

What was NOT a result of the construction of the canal from Lake Erie to the Hudson River is "Federal financing became more readily available."

This is because the construction of the canal from Lake Erie to the Hudson River was done between 1817 and 1825, and was majorly carried out by raw manpower provided by Irishmen using basic equipment with very little pay to show for their hard work.

Hence, it provided employment opportunities for people particularly immigrants such as Irish, and also the construction of houses grew along the canal routes due to an increase in population in the area.

Also, it reduced the cost of transportation of goods.

However, it does not lead to the availability of Federal financing.

i actually have a suggestion instead of an answer, how about next time instead of spending the time to time up the question you take that time and try to figure something out for yourself, do you understand?

explanation:

leave a 5 star and a and brainliest answer if you understand, hope this betters you day, or not i don't really care either way. xd

"a shortage of traditional labor created new opportunities in the workplace. a major cause of the internment of japanese americans during world war ii was. racial prejudice. in the early 1940's, the "destroyers-for-military-bases deal" with great britain and the lend-lease act were evidence that the united states."