The school officials banned and sought to punish for a silent, passive expression of opinion, unaccompanied by any disorder
or disturbance on the part of petitioners. There is here no
evidence whatever of petitioners interference, actual or nascent,
with the schools' work or of collision with the rights of other
students to be secure and to be let alone. Accordingly, this case
does not concern speech or action that intrudes upon the work
of the schools or the rights of other students.
O A. To explain how silent protests don't fall under freedom of speech
protection because no words are used
B. To redefine the amendment dealing with freedom of speech
C. To point out that the school officials were not justified in their
accusations toward the students
D. To explain the school's complaints against the students

according to greek mythology, persephone, the queen of the underworld, was the daughter of zeus and demeter, the goddess of harvest and fertility. she was also called kore, which means "maiden" and grew up to be a lovely girl attracting the attention of many gods.

explanation:

it would be that mali has the worst literacy rate than the others

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is