In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without a warrant. Identify one way in which the case is legally
significant.

D. It established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Explanation:

In Katz v. United States, the FBI had arrested Charles Katz who was into illegal sports betting after listening in on his conversation in a phone booth without a search warrant. They listened to his conversation from outside the phone booth because they did not want to break the Fourth Amendment which demanded that they use a warrant.

The lower courts supported the FBI until the case reached the Supreme Court which stated that the FBI was in breach of the Fourth Amendment because of the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy which meant that even if a person was in the public domain, there were things that they wanted to keep private and the Fourth Amendment protected this.

no statements but ok.

the statement that best describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century would be that "it was fate that the united states would continue to  expand westward," since people thought the us was "destined" to do so.