History, 27.05.2021 16:20 zabomoxx5ll
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?
A. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
B. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened
C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
D. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
SUBMIT
PREVIOUS
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 22.06.2019 08:30, elizavlsc4
Search america's open door policy with china beginning in 1899. explain how relations with the united states and china have changed and the effects of the open door policy on both countries.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 09:30, iilovejohnccena1022
Which of these statements describes the relationship between urbanization and the divison of labor during the bronze age?
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 10:00, anthonygeorge7
In the 1950s, the u. s. government encouraged american jazz musicians to perform in the soviet union, which was an enemy of the u. s. at the time. of what foreign policy goal is this a good example? strengthening world economic growth improving education for the global population advancing the growth of democracy and good government increasing understanding of american values and creating a receptive international environment
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historic...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 04.04.2020 01:57
Mathematics, 04.04.2020 01:57
Mathematics, 04.04.2020 01:57
Physics, 04.04.2020 01:57
