Need to finish this today any help ? Amnesty Question:
One of the problems confronting politicians in Washington DC today, is how to manage the 10.5 million-12 million undocumented people in the US today. What would you support and explain why.
Maybe you support granting them citizenship like Ronald Reagan did in the 1980’s, of course, that was only 3 million people. Explain your answer and why.
Maybe you feel that these people broke the law and allowing them to now be citizens would only invite more people in illegally, and then in a few years they will also get amnesty. So if you don’t like that idea, explain that and why.
Maybe you have another idea. Whichever idea you decide, please explain why

This does seem like more of a topic where you have to choose what you want to do, but I'll give you my opinions on this. I think the problem with the undocumented people in this country is definitely an issue. I personally believe that the only people who should come here are people who take the time to come here legally. As a conservative, I highly supported Donald Trump's border wall, and that appeared to have handled the border crisis very well.

Many of the people coming in are criminals who are bringing in many illegal items and are posing a threat to the country. This is why I think we should just keep everyone out, and only get the people who are legal to come in. I think it would do more harm than good if we just let all these unknown people in.

In conclusion, I would support the idea of essentially just blocking these people off from even being able to enter our country, and only the people who have proved themselves to be responsible shall be granted their citizenship.

the ones that are losing there jobs

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation: