Do you believe it will be easier for law enforcement officers to apprehend criminals if they are not aware of fingerprinting? Why?​

Explanation:

This depends on who you mean by they. If by they you mean the criminals, then yes. This is because the criminals will most likely not use gloves and touch everything when performing the crime. This will allow law enforcement to clearly and quickly identify the individuals responsible and arrest them.

If by they you mean law enforcement then No. Fingerprinting is a crucial piece of crime scene investigation. It allows law enforcement to identify a specific individual that was at the scene of the crime. Since every single fingerprint is unique it is a vital piece of evidence in an investigation. Without it the officers would need lots more evidence and luck in order to prove that a specific individual was responsible for the crime.

the fact that could also be added to column b is that during world war ii, specifically between the years 1941 and 1945, japan expanded its territory towards the indonesian territory in what was known later as part of the "pacific war". in that time, japan could conquer the philipines, singapore,   borneo, central java, malang, cebu, sumatra and various other islands of the area, therefore expanding its territory for a brief period of time.