How did the Korean Conflict reflect the political competition between the Soviet Union and the United States? The Soviet Union sent troops into Korea to gain a naval base on the Sea of Japan, while the United States convinced the United Nations to enact sanctions against the Soviets to reverse their gains. The Soviet Union sent troops and supplies to defend North Korea’s communist government after the United States and South Korea attempted to unify the two nations under one democratic government. The Soviet Union allied with Vietnam to reclaim the Korean Peninsula under communist control, while the United States accepted Great Britain’s assistance in opposing Vietnamese aggression. The Soviet Union supported North Korea’s attempt to unite the Korean Peninsula under a communist government, while the United States sent troops and supplies to defend the democratic government in South Korea.

Hello! Your answer is, D)The Soviet Union supported North Korea’s attempt to unite the Korean Peninsula under a communist government, while the United States sent troops and supplies to defend the democratic government in South Korea.

Explanation:

Hope I helped! Ask me anything if you have any questions! Brainiest plz! Hope you make an 100% and have a wonderful day! -Amelia♥

The soviet union allied with vietnam to reclaim the Korean peninsula under communism control, while the united states accepted great Britain's assistance in opposing vietnamese aggression.

Explanation:

Hope this helped have a great day bye

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

in the declaration of independence, thomas jefferson announced that every human being has “certain unalienable rights,” among which are those to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of " hope i