How did historians from the 1970s to the 1990s view how FDR handled the Great Depression in the 1930s? They believed that his programs were a sort of "half-way revolution," and there was still a lot more that he could have done.

They believed that his New Deal programs were a "revolutionary response to a revolutionary situation."

They believed that he handled the Great Depression the best that he could at a time when American society was not open to sweeping reforms.

They believed that he should have focused more on wealth redistribution, improvement of race relations, and industrial regulation.

a

explanation:

a best description that resulted a division among labor in the early farming communities in their period was there was a change in their society in terms of having social roles to develop and change that led complications and divisions in the society.

0. how did the annual sum of their wages compare with the cost of tallow candles at potosí? tallow candles were 300,000 so for huancavelica it takes 3,000 years and for chaplains it took 350 years.11. compare the wages of the mita workers at potosí with the wages paid those amerindians (native americans) who freely hired themselves out? the amerindians made 3 to 4 times more than the mita workers.12. what do you conclude about these figures (6 – 9)? 2

though both had similar roots, they both took these similar bases & formed it into their own way. both the byzantine empire and ancient roman have similar aspects, but each one made it unique. both the byzantine empire and ancient romans had roman influences which affected their culture