History, 03.05.2021 23:20 hhhhhhhhhhhhhhh1509
12 Angry men 1997
Who was chosen to serve on the jury?
Was the jury in this case representative?
Was the jury in this case impartial?
Is there a difference between representative and impartial? If so, is the difference critical?
What were the primary concerns of the jurors?
What factors influenced the jurors as they discussed and decided this case?
Did the jurors believe that they were doing their job responsibly?
What factors convinced them to change their votes?
Which of these concerns had a constitutional basis?
What, ultimately, was the crucial factor in determining the outcome of the trial?
What did the jurors learn while deliberating the case?
About the trial?
About themselves?
About the Constitution?
Does this play/film leave you feeling concerned or confident that a "trial by jury" results in a fair trial? What are the reasons for your position?
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 22:50, pablohc200021
The term globalization is best defined as: a. a reduction in the political and military power of imperial countries over their colonies. b. an increasing interaction among citizens and businesses of countries around the world. c. the spread of philosophies based on the right of all nations to political independence. d. the establishment of international laws protecting all people's human and civil rights.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, grantjaylynn
What effect did ww11 have on empires that had been created by european nations
Answers: 1
12 Angry men 1997
Who was chosen to serve on the jury?
Was the jury in this case representat...
Was the jury in this case representat...
Health, 12.07.2019 12:00
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 12:00
Biology, 12.07.2019 12:00