Could the Historical Leader Lead Today? In this task, you'll imagine that the leader you wrote about in Task 1 is alive today.
JULIUS CAESAR

Consider this figure's qualities and characteristics. Then write another three- paragraph essay expressing your opinion about whether this person would still be a great leader today.

Part A You identified the three main qualities of a good leader in the previous task. You also identified a historical figure that you believe was a great leader for the time. Think about what this person would be like if he or she lived today. First, look at list of some modern characteristics of a leader e. Compare the qualities and characteristics of the historical leader you chose to this list. Then identify any characteristics that match your leader and explain why you think they do.

PART B
you have identified ways that the historical figure you select it was a great leader in the past and now you've examined some characteristics of great leaders today now you will write another three paragraph essay. Your essay should express your opinion about whether this leader would still be an effective leader today. ​

a yes vote means: the legislature, with a two-thirds vote, could change daylight saving time if the change is allowed by the federal government. absent any legislative change, california would maintain its current daylight saving time period

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."

the anwer to

this question is false the spnaish had more than enough reinforcments and soldiders to defeat the azatecs becuase the azatecs did not have the advanced technolgy the spanish did

europeans carried a hidden enemy to the indians: new diseases. native peoples of america had no immunity to the diseases that european explorers and colonists brought with them. diseases such as smallpox, influenza, measles, and even chicken pox proved deadly to american indians