Which of the following best describes the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in regards to the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty? Group of answer choices

Both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty were deemed to be unconstitutional

Both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty were deemed to be constitutional

The Missouri Compromise as constitutional, but popular sovereignty was unconstitutional

The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, but popular sovereignty was constitutional

The Court ruled that no African American could be a citizen and that Dred Scott was still a slave. The court also ruled that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty were deemed to be unconstitutional

Explanation:

If i remember correctly from when I learned it, that was the conclusion.

ching cong bing bong

regarding the law, the 15th amendment was specifically designed thinking in the rights of black free men.

even though ratified on february 3, 1870, the promise of the 15th amendment would not be fully applied for a long time.poll taxes and literacy tests would allow southern states disenfranchise african americans. only in 1965 the voting rights for african americans would be actually able to vote in the south.

in 1965, president johnson signed the voting rights act, which aimed to overcome legal barriers that prevented african americans from voting as it was guaranteed by the 15th amendment to the u.s. constitution.