Do you find anything to be problematic with Section 3 of the resolution, particularly in a democracy? This is section 3 of the Joint Resolution of Congress H. J. RES 1145 August 7, 1964
—Gulf of Tonkin Resolution

Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the

President shall determine that the peace and security

of the area is reasonably assured by international

conditions created by action of the United Nations

or otherwise, except that it may be terminated

earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress.

it reintroduced the two-party system.

randy pausch was a famous mathematician, writer and lecturer who is particularly famous for his last speech, given in 2007, "the las lecture", because he illustrates why one's dreams need to be pursued in a logical order if success is to be obtained, option c. at this time, pausch had been diagnosed with terminal cancer so he told the audience to follow their childhood dreams, which were possible to achieve. it has been recognized as one of the best motivational speech around the world.

question as stated in comment

why did the chinese require the portuguese to pay for goods in gold and silver when trading?

choices

portuguese goods were less valuable than chinese goods.

the chinese already had a surplus of portuguese goods.

the imperial government wanted to stockpile gold and silver.

portuguese and chinese currencies were not exchangeable.

this a history q n in ancient time, theres no money exchange. so ans is portuguese and chinese currencies were not exchangeable.