Keynes would most likely support a plan for government ownership of most production creating a worldwide free trade agreement eliminating income taxes on the wealthy income taxes based on ability to pay

Keynes would in all likelihood bolster an arrangement for government responsibility for production since that is the place his strategies were coordinated in the only remaining century.

Keynes declared government shortfall spending to enhance total interest during financial compression as a necessary chore that may not be perceived by everybody or anybody ever.

irzururyecmury u4yrye ad iruryesiururslueuryr itsl47d58url yeeslye

explanation:

uriueur urii57fiiurslitslurslueursruuu irsi4ueuriturrudurdirsurzrul

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.