History, 27.09.2019 13:30 dondre54

In the bhopal case, union carbide officials claimed that they did not apply a "double standard" in safety regulations, and insisted that there were no differences between the bhopal plant and union carbide's west virginia plant. this argument was erroneous but served as a/an for union carbide.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 19:10, joebossmc2184

Historians are concerned with the accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of the inability of authors to know every angle of every story biases, perspectives, beliefs, and a variety of other differences history being told by one person at a time no one being totally accurate, as hard as we try really need on this, and you^^

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 22:10, maxy7347go

All of the following are true of humanism during the renaissance except a. it was a new way of looking at the world c. it focused on religion b. it caused ancient roman and greek texts to become popular d. it dealt with emotion

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:50, stephesquilin

Wha industry did the refrigerated rail car impact the most

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 09:30, bobokitty

What happened in the tinker v des monies? and why is it important what happened in the hazlewood v. kuhlmeier? why is it important?

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

In the bhopal case, union carbide officials claimed that they did not apply a "double standard" in s...